Digital editing is part of the post-production process of
digital video making. Using Adobe premiere pro, on Apple Mac computers, we
worked with the raw footage, selecting shots and combined them into a sequence.
Prior to starting the editing process I was slightly
ambiguous about the Adobe technology, as it had been several months since we
had been using it, in our trial lip sync, and we had to remember that how we
use it determines our final produce. Hence we proceeding very articulately, we
began by reviewing and selecting shots. This forced use to make some initial
decisions as some of the shots were very obviously inappropriate to use for
instance in some cases our lead did not sing the correct lyrics making the
shots look very unprofessional, but there were also various other reasons too,
such as bad lighting, bad composition, actors not performing correctly, no
content, and so on. Another issue that we faced was that some of the later
woods footage was far too dark so we were unable to use some of those shots.
This process enabled us to select footage that we wanted, which we then
labelled depending on the set (projections in studio/woods etc). We were then
able to drag this raw footage onto the timeline presenting the structure of our
video.
Once this was completed we completed the same process with
the woods and projections in woods scenes, producing three layers enabling us
to cut between the layers with the studio as the base. It soon became apparent
that we needed to name and rename more clips as we had so many areas of footage it became very
confusing. During this, we decided that we wanted to slowly reveal the shots in
the woods making the video progressively more interesting so the viewer would not get bored of the
studio footage, we made the decision to open the video with short clips of the
woods to entice the viewer into the narrative.
![]() |
| The timeline |
I found editing the woods footage very difficult due to the
limited footage we had, unfortunately, as previously stated, a lot of the
footage was too dark so was out of focus, also we had a very limited amount of
shot types, meaning that we had minimal
close ups to cut too making the footage a bit boring. However due to the
integration of the studio shots and the use of fragmented editing, we could
disguise our limitations. The marker tool helped us cut out fragments of the
clips on the beat of the track making the edits more ‘jittery’ and interesting
for the viewer. If I were to repeat the process I wouldn’t change the editing
as I believe we made the best of what we had, instead I would ensure there was a larger variety of well-lit and
composed shots from the woods as this would have made the process far more efficient.
In our edit we used a series of jump cuts, which cut from
set to set. Obviously this implicates the continuity of the video to some
extent. However due to the creative nature of pop video edits, this does not
present to much of an issue. In the case of the AS thriller opening sequence, unless continuity was
deliberately distorted, this would have been problematic as it would have made the
narrative unclear to the audience.
Overall, I am particularly pleased that we made a large
emphasis on the star image relating to the conventions of music videos, we
achieved this by using many close ups of the band and especially the lead, also
the boy/girl narrative evolves around lead engaging the viewer into his
presence.
Here is the initial rough cut that we edited:







Great use video and pictures to make this a visual post. You have written a detailed step by step account of your edit, as well as reflecting over why. Though you could develop your reflective editing by considering how successful certain stages of your edit were, this is a detailed an overall good post.
ReplyDelete